by
Julia Affolderbach and Christian Schulz
When
starting our research on green building initiatives and urban low-carbon
strategies in Canada, Europe and Australia, we came across the promising
complementarities of the Transition Studies approach on the one hand, and the
more recent debate around Policy Mobilities. Given our primary interest in
political, institutional, regulatory and organisational innovations and their
impact on the greening of the building sector, the Social Studies of Technology
(or “Transition Studies”) provided us with a useful heuristic to explore the
interplay between niches for innovation, evolutions of the established regimes
and changes of the general context conditions (“landscape”). But we also had to
acknowledge the insufficient conceptualization of space in this approach, in
particular when it comes to supra-national relationships, knowledge flows and
long-distance influences. Here, the Policy Mobility approach allowed us to
operationalize the extent to which local policies and actors’ behaviour are
embedded into wider networks of constant policy exchange and learning
processes, but also selective adoption and reinterpretation (mutation) of trend
setting approaches. A combination of the two approaches gave us the opportunity
to study both the localised settings and their impact on green building
innovations and the relational articulation of urban sustainability programmes
at the international level. The paper thus tries to contribute to the advancing
conceptualization of space in the Transitions Studies literature, and – given
its sectorial focus – to feed case study results from economic geography into
the scholarly debates around the notion of Policy Mobility. We are convinced
that a further engagement of the two approaches might not only reciprocally
inspire the enrolled communities of researchers, but that it could also open
new perspectives for both academics and practitioners/decision makers.
Provision
of knowledge and evidence on the actual pathways and biographies of successful
urban policies provides a basis to reconsider existing strategies without
overrating the importance of local framework conditions in order (1) to
facilitate the exchange and critical conversation with practitioners and
decision makers in other city regions and (2) to develop a systemic
understanding of influential levels and scales, without reifying the latter.
A
wide range of topics regarding sustainable transitions might serve as test beds
for this recombined approach including the multi-facetted energy policy
aspiring for low carbon transitions (encompassing the decentralized use of
renewables, low/zero/plus energy buildings, district heating, smart grids), transport
and mobility issues, food security and urban farming, and more organizational
issues such as community planning, co-housing, or solidary economies, and local
sharing schemes. All of these are identified as highly innovative fields
showing dynamics of rapid and international dissemination as well as
re-adaptation of promising concepts.
No comments:
Post a Comment